首页> 外文OA文献 >To Beat or Not to Beat: Beat Gestures in Direction Giving
【2h】

To Beat or Not to Beat: Beat Gestures in Direction Giving

机译:打败还是不打败:给予方向打手势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research on gesture generation for embodied conversational agents (ECA’s) mostly focuses on gesture types such as pointing and iconic gestures, while ignoring another gesture type frequently used by human speakers: beat gestures. Analysis of a corpus of route descriptions showed that although annotators show very low agreement in applying a ‘beat filter’ aimed at identifying physical features of beat gestures, they are capable of reliably distinguishing beats from other gestures in a more intuitive manner. Beat gestures made up more than 30% of the gestures in our corpus, and they were sometimes used when expressing concepts for which other gesture types seemed a more obvious choice.Based on these findings we propose a simple, probabilistic model of beat production for ECA’s. However, it is clear that more research is needed to determine why direction givers in some cases use beats when other gestures seem more appropriate, and vice versa.
机译:针对具体化的对话代理(ECA)进行的手势生成研究主要集中在指向和图标手势之类的手势类型上,而忽略了人类说话者经常使用的另一种手势类型:拍打手势。对路线描述语料库的分析表明,尽管注释者在应用“节拍过滤器”以识别节拍手势的物理特征方面显示出非常低的共识,但他们能够以更直观的方式可靠地将节拍与其他手势区分开。节拍手势占我们语料库中手势的30%以上,有时在表达其他手势类型似乎更明显的概念时使用它们,基于这些发现,我们提出了一个简单的概率模型,用于ECA的节拍产生。但是,很明显,需要进行更多的研究来确定为什么在某些情况下指挥者在其他手势似乎更合适时会使用节拍,反之亦然。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号